Possessive Form of Jesus: Jesus’ or Jesus’s?

The possessive form of Jesus can be written as either Jesus’ or Jesus’s, depending on the style guide, pronunciation, and editorial policy being followed. In current Chicago style, the recommended form is Jesus’s: Jesus’s teachings, Jesus’s name, and Jesus’s followers.

The traditional form Jesus’ is still widely used, especially in religious writing and by style guides that treat biblical or classical names ending in -s as exceptions. Therefore, both Jesus’ name and Jesus’s name are found in edited English, but a writer should choose one form and use it consistently.

What is the possessive form of Jesus?

Under the general rule for singular nouns, the possessive is formed by adding an apostrophe and s, regardless of the final consonant: Jane’s book, Keats’s poems, the boat’s mast, and Jesus’s teachings.

Accordingly, the form recommended by the current Chicago Manual of Style is Jesus’s. Examples include Jesus’s name, Jesus’s teachings, Jesus’s adherents, Jesus’s nativity, and for Jesus’s sake.

Why is Jesus’ also used?

The traditional custom has been to drop the final s when writing the possessives of ancient classical or biblical names that already end in s. This convention produced forms such as Jesus’ name, Moses’ law, and Achilles’ helmet.

Some stylebooks still recommend a single apostrophe for Biblical or classical names like Jesus and Achilles, but ’s for names like James and Charles; others say, “Treat all names ending in s the same.” The result is that both Jesus’ and Jesus’s continue to appear in standard writing.

Chicago style and the change from Jesus’ to Jesus’s

The first edition of CMOS (1906) advised using an apostrophe alone to form the possessive of “proper names of more than one syllable ending in s or another sibilant”; for one-syllable names, the rule was the same as for names that didn’t end in a sibilant-that is, add an apostrophe plus an s.

In other words, you would write “King James’s Version,” “Burns’s poems,” and “Marx’s theories” (one-syllable names), but “Moses’ law,” “Demosthenes’ orations,” and “Berlioz’ compositions” (names with two or more syllables, a category that Harris belongs to).

Except for a couple of clarifications for names like Charlevoix and Horace (both of which would get an ’s), the original rule remained in place until 1969, when the twelfth edition was published. That edition eliminated all but a few exceptions to the ’s convention: “Exceptions are the names Jesus and Moses and Greek (or hellenized) names of more than one syllable ending in es”-as in “Jesus’ nativity,” “Moses’ leadership,” and “Xerxes’ army” (12th ed., ¶ 6.8).

The sixteenth edition (2010) then eliminated all remaining exceptions (including one for names ending in a silent s that had been added to the fifteenth edition [2003]), and that’s where CMOS stands today-that is, add an apostrophe plus an s to form the possessive of any person’s name, regardless of number of syllables or ancient pedigree.

So whether you’re referring to “Moses’s leadership” or (to bring things up to date) “Harris’s speech”-or, yes, “Walz’s speech,” though single-syllable names ending in z were never in question-Chicago’s rule for forming the possessive of a person’s name is now the same for all. For more details, start with CMOS 7.17.

Examples in current Chicago style

Jesus’ versus Jesus’s in different style guides

Most stylebooks agree that the rule for forming the possessive of a singular noun ending in -s is formed by adding ’s: the boss’s birthday, the bus’s wheels, and the witness’s testimony.

When it comes to forming the possessive of a proper name that ends in s, guides disagree. Some stylebooks recommend a single apostrophe for Biblical or classical names like Jesus and Achilles, while others say that all names ending in s should be treated alike.

Chicago Manual of Style

CMOS has changed its policy in a spirit of consistency; now it recommends that all proper names ending in -s form their possessive by adding ’s: Moses’s tent, Achilles’s helmet, Jesus’s name, Travis’s friends, Dickens’s novels, Descartes’s philosophy, François’s efforts, Tacitus’s Histories, Kansas’s legislature, Euripides’s tragedies, and the Ganges’s source.

Associated Press style

Equally consistent, the Associated Press Style Book opts for a single apostrophe for all proper names ending in -s: Moses’ tent, Achilles’ helmet, Jesus’ name, Travis’ friends, Dickens’ novels, Descartes’ philosophy, François’ efforts, Tacitus’ Histories, Kansas’ legislature, Euripides’ tragedies, and the Ganges’ source.

The New York Times style

The New York Times style manual generally agrees with CMOS, but adds this wrinkle: Omit the s after the apostrophe when a word ends in two sibilant sounds…separated only by a vowel sound: Kansas’ Governor; Texas’ population; Moses’ behalf… But when a name ends with a sibilant letter that is silent, keep the possessive s: Arkansas’s…

Pronunciation-based guidance

One approach is to choose the spelling according to pronunciation. A name ending in s takes only an apostrophe if the possessive form is not pronounced with an extra s. Hence: Socrates’ philosophy, Ulysses’ companions, Saint Saens’ music, and Aristophanes’ plays.

The reasoning behind this rule is that as we don’t say [sok-ru-teez-iz], there’s no reason to write “Socrates’s.” Punctuation is supposed to aid readers, not puzzle them. It’s no help to readers unfamiliar with English pronunciation to mislead them into trying to say [dick-inz-iz], or [u-rip-uh-deez-iz] by writing “Dickens’s novels” or “Euripides’s plays.”

Today the final s is optional: Euripides’ plays or Euripides’s plays, Moses’ staff or Moses’s staff, Jesus’ teachings or Jesus’s teachings.

If you add an extra syllable when pronouncing one of these possessive names (MO-zus-uz), then add the final s (Moses’s). If you don’t pronounce that last s (and many people don’t, especially if the name ends in an EEZ sound, like Euripides), then don’t write it.

So the choice can be based on pronunciation: if you pronounce the possessive form of Jesus as JEE-zus, add the apostrophe alone; but if you pronounce it as JEE-zus-uz, then add ’s.

Jesus’ name or Jesus’s name?

Both Jesus’ name and Jesus’s name are used in edited English. The form written with an apostrophe plus s can represent either a contraction (short for “Jesus is” or “Jesus has”) or the possessive form of the name. But in the expression you’re writing, it would clearly be the possessive. There’s no way a member of a prayer group would think otherwise.

The rule here is the same as it would be for any name-the apostrophe plus s at the end can signify either a contraction or a possessive. For example, James’s can be a contraction of “James is” or “James has” (as in “James’s coming” or “James’s grown a beard”), or it can be the possessive form of the name (as in “She is James’s niece”).

When the name is Jesus, there’s a twist with the possessive form. This is because there are two ways to form the possessive of an ancient classical or biblical name that ends in s. The result is that a prayer could correctly be written with either Jesus’ precious name or Jesus’s precious name.

In the expression In Jesus’ Precious Name or In Jesus’s Precious Name, the possessive refers to the name associated with Jesus. Both spellings can be understood, but Jesus’s Precious Name follows current Chicago style, while Jesus’ Precious Name follows the traditional convention used by many religious writers.

For Jesus’ sake or for Jesus’s sake?

Earlier editions of Chicago treated Jesus as an exception in certain for … sake expressions. In the fifteenth edition (2003), an additional exception was specifically noted: for Jesus’ sake.

The sixteenth edition changed this practice. Only “for goodness’ sake” and “for righteousness’ sake” may use an apostrophe instead of an apostrophe-s because of euphony. The sixteenth edition specifically lists for Jesus’s sake.

Jesus’s is not automatically a contraction

The form Jesus’s can be either a possessive form or a contraction, just as James’s can be either a possessive or a contraction. Context determines the meaning.

• Jesus’s teachings changed the lives of his followers. In this sentence, Jesus’s is possessive.
• Jesus’s coming. In this sentence, Jesus’s can be short for “Jesus is.”
• Jesus’s grown a beard. In this sentence, Jesus’s can be short for “Jesus has.”

In a phrase such as Jesus’s name or Jesus’s teachings, the form is clearly possessive. The apostrophe and s do not create ambiguity in normal context.

General rules for possessives

Singular nouns

The possessive of a singular noun is formed by adding ’s (whatever the final consonant). Examples include Jane’s book, Keats’s poems, the boat’s mast, and Jesus’s teachings.

Plural nouns

The possessive of a plural noun is formed by adding only an apostrophe after the final letter if it is an s (or by adding an ’s if the final letter is not an s).

• the students’ papers
• the children’s toys
• the Clemenses’ box seats

Pronouns

The possessive of a pronoun has no apostrophe. Examples include his, theirs, yours, and its.

• The pen is his.
• The car is theirs.
• The decision is yours.
• The car lost its hubcap.

Note that it’s is a contraction meaning “it is.” It’s is never a possessive form.

How to choose between Jesus’ and Jesus’s

If you are writing for publication, how you treat the possessive of proper names that end in -s will be determined by your employer’s house style. A publication may require Jesus’s, Jesus’, or a broader rule that applies to all names ending in s.

If you are free to choose which style to follow, keep in mind that the writer’s goal is to convey thoughts as clearly as possible to readers. Style guides exist to assist writers in this goal, but it seems to me that there are problems with the recommendations of all three guides mentioned above.

Writers not bound by a specific style manual must make their own decision and be consistent with it. Consistency is more important than switching between Jesus’ and Jesus’s in the same piece of writing.

• Choose Jesus’s when following current Chicago style or another style that adds ’s to every singular proper name.
• Choose Jesus’ when following a style that uses a single apostrophe for biblical or classical names ending in s.
• Choose the form that reflects your pronunciation when following pronunciation-based guidance.
• Use the same policy throughout a document.

The safest general choice for writers using current Chicago style is Jesus’s. The traditional form Jesus’ remains acceptable in styles that preserve the older biblical-name convention.

tags: #possessive #form #of #jesus